首页> 外文OA文献 >Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis when testing non-respiratory samples: a systematic review
【2h】

Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis when testing non-respiratory samples: a systematic review

机译:Xpert MTB / RIF分析在检测非呼吸性样本时对肺外和肺结核的诊断准确性:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND:Although the evidence base regarding the use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) when testing respiratory samples is well established, the evidence base for its diagnostic accuracy for extrapulmonary and sputum-scarce pulmonary TB when testing non-respiratory samples is less clearly defined. METHODS: A systematic literature search of 7 electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, BIOSIS, Global Health Database, Scopus and Cochrane Database) was conducted to identify studies of the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert assay when testing non-respiratory samples compared with a culture-based reference standard. Data were extracted and study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated on a per-sample basis, stratified by sample type and smear microscopy status and summarised using forest plots. Pooled estimates were calculated for groups with sufficient data. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies with a total of 6,026 non-respiratory samples were included. Among the 23 studies comparing Xpert and culture done on the same samples, sensitivity was very heterogeneous with a median sensitivity of 0.83 (IQR, 0.68-0.94) whereas specificities were typically very high (median, 0.98; IQR, 0.89-1.00). The pooled summary estimates of sensitivity when testing smear-positive and smear-negative samples were 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-1.00) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.60-0.80), respectively. Pooled summary estimates of sensitivity varied substantially between sample types: lymph node tissue, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.72-0.99); tissue samples of all types, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.76-0.94); pleural fluid, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.24-0.44); gastric aspirates for diagnosis of sputum-scarce pulmonary TB, 0.78 (IQR, 0.68 - 0.85). Median sensitivities when testing cerebrospinal fluid and non-pleural serous fluid samples were 0.85 (IQR, 0.75-1.00) and 0.67 (IQR, 0.00-1.00), respectively. CONCLUSION: Xpert detects with high specificity the vast majority of EPTB cases with smear-positive non-respiratory samples and approximately two-thirds of those with smear-negative samples. Xpert is a useful rule-in diagnostic test for EPTB, especially when testing cerebrospinal fluid and tissue samples. In addition, it has a high sensitivity for detecting pulmonary TB when using gastric aspirate samples. These findings support recent WHO guidelines regarding the use of Xpert for TB diagnosis from non-respiratory samples.
机译:背景:尽管关于建立Xpert MTB / RIF测定法在检测呼吸道样本时诊断肺结核的证据基础已经建立,但在非肺结核和痰液稀少的肺结核法诊断时,其诊断准确性的证据基础-呼吸样品的定义不太明确。方法:对7个电子数据库(Medline,EMBASE,ISI Web of Science,BIOSIS,Global Health Database,Scopus和Cochrane数据库)进行了系统的文献检索,以鉴定Xpert检测在测试非呼吸性样品时的诊断准确性。与基于文化的参考标准相比。使用QUADAS-2工具提取数据并评估研究质量。敏感性和特异性是在每个样品的基础上计算的,按样品类型和涂片显微镜检查状态进行分层,并使用森林图进行汇总。对具有足够数据的组计算汇总估计。结果:共纳入27项研究,共计6,026份非呼吸性样本。在对Xpert和在相同样品上进行的培养进行比较的23项研究中,灵敏度非常不均一,中位灵敏度为0.83(IQR,0.68-0.94),而特异性通常很高(中位数为0.98; IQR,0.89-1.00)。测试涂片阳性和涂片阴性样品时的敏感性汇总汇总估计分别为0.95(95%CI 0.91-1.00)和0.69(95%CI 0.60-0.80)。汇总的敏感性汇总估计值在以下样本类型之间有很大差异:淋巴结组织0.96(95%CI 0.72-0.99);各种类型的组织样本,0.88(95%CI,0.76-0.94);胸水0.34(95%CI,0.24-0.44);胃抽吸物可诊断出痰少的肺结核0.78(IQR,0.68-0.85)。测试脑脊液和非胸膜浆液样品时的中位敏感性分别为0.85(IQR,0.75-1.00)和0.67(IQR,0.00-1.00)。结论:Xpert以高特异性检测出涂片阳性非呼吸道样本的绝大部分EPTB病例,涂片阴性样本约占三分之二。 Xpert是用于EPTB的有用的常规诊断测试,尤其是在测试脑脊液和组织样本时。此外,当使用胃抽吸样品时,它对检测肺结核具有很高的灵敏度。这些发现支持了世界卫生组织关于使用Xpert从非呼吸性样本诊断结核病的最新指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号